Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Thomas Church, Kokkamangalam
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep (well slightly speedy) per WP:SNOW. No policy-based reasons for deletion were offered; several editors pointed out policy-based reasons to keep; User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi improved the article to deal with the issues raised by the nominator. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 01:03, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- St. Thomas Church, Kokkamangalam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No in-line citations. Also, the website mentioned in the External Links section is dead. coffeecup89 (talk) 10:38, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
- Keep passes WP:GEOFEAT. @Nom, none of the reasons you gave in your nominationa are WP:DEL-REASON, and WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP :) — fortunavelut luna 14:30, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:25, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:26, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - neither of the reasons offered by the nominator are valid, but in any case User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi has fixed the article. StAnselm (talk) 03:49, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep thanks to FIM for fixing this. Meets our standards for notability per GEOFEAT as he has pointed out. I will also note that in addition to the standard GEOFEAT notability, this Church claims to have been established by Saint Thomas the Apostle. Whether or not that is true is a matter for scholars to debate, but the claim which appears to be limited to only seven churches in Indian according to the article and the sourcing provided certainly makes it one of the more notable churches in India. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:05, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Clear historic monument. -- Necrothesp (talk) 20:34, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 20:34, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Historical church built in 52 A.D. It clearly passes WP:N. --Elton-Rodrigues 23:46, 3 July 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elton-Rodrigues (talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.